The Kendall Report

The Kendall Report

Friday Decides Whether This Is a Range or a Top

The Kendall Report's avatar
The Kendall Report
Jun 09, 2026
∙ Paid

KR Market Opinion

Monday gave us a rebound, and for most of the session, it was a strong one. Then it faded into the close, and as we came into Tuesday, we picked up some overnight strength again. I want to be honest about what that pattern tells me, because it is the kind of action that can fool people. A market that rallies all day and then leaks into the bell is not a market that has made up its mind. It is a market waiting on something. And right now it is waiting on three things: CPI, PPI, and the event everyone on the street is actually whispering about, the SpaceX offering on Friday.

That IPO is poised to be the biggest we have ever seen, and the rhetoric around it has taken on a life of its own. The story making the rounds on Wall Street, on YouTube, on X, is that mega offerings mark tops. The logic goes that a deal this size is an exclamation point on a cycle, that it sucks the last of the demand out of the room, and that the AI bubble everyone has been warning about finally pops the moment the bell rings on Friday. I understand why that story is attractive. It lets people who have been calling for a crash claim they were early rather than wrong. But I do not think it holds up to the facts.

Start with the demand side. We have never seen an IPO this large, and the appetite for it appears enormous. Yes, some buyers will have to sell other holdings to fund their interest, and that is real. But that is rotation, not destruction. Money comes from one place and goes to another. It does not leave the system. And the indexes themselves look like they are getting a slow walk into the position rather than a violent reweighting, so the mechanical pressure on the broad market should be milder than the doomsayers expect. On top of that we have OpenAI filing confidentially and Anthropic filing as well. The numbers are big, but Wall Street is ready for them, and here is the part that matters most: this is not a domestic offering the way these things used to be. It is a world market offering. The capital pool it draws from is the entire planet, not just the United States.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

That global pool is the through-line for almost everything I am watching right now. The US market remains one of the primary venues the whole world trades, so the bulk of the planet’s cash flow still circulates here. When a deal can pull from everywhere, the idea that one offering drains the tank simply does not square with the size of the tank. A domestic IPO competes for domestic dollars, and you can see how that math would worry people if the deal were big enough. But a world market offering competes for world dollars, and the pool it draws from is so much deeper that the drainage argument loses most of its force. That is the piece the crash callers keep leaving out.

History backs this up more than the bears would like. On average the Nasdaq Composite gained almost eleven percent in the year after a mega IPO, while the S&P managed only about a percent. Plenty of the marquee names struggled in their own first year, Facebook, Alibaba, Aramco, and Rivian all took sharp losses, with Arm the major exception, more than doubling with a gain north of 130 percent. Now, I am careful with statistics like these because there is really no firm basis for most of what people claim about how these offerings behave. But the pattern that does hold up is the one that matters: the headline deal and the broad index do not move in lockstep. A rough first year for the new ticker has not historically meant a rough year for the market that absorbed it. And it is worth noting the Nasdaq made changes this year that could make it easier for a name like SpaceX to enter the Nasdaq 100, which is the index most likely to feel any direct effect. So if there is a place to watch for genuine mechanical pressure, it is there, not in the broad tape.

Now to the data. We get CPI and then PPI this week, and the numbers are expected to come in elevated. I am not looking for a surprise in either direction. If anything we have seen the figures flatten, and a good part of that is crude oil stabilizing along with a few other inputs settling down. When energy steadies, a lot of the heat comes out of the headline inflation prints, and that is roughly where we are. So I am not building a thesis around an inflation shock this week, and I would caution against trading as if one is coming. The prints matter for tone and for the knee-jerk reaction, but they are not where I think the week is decided. The setup that matters is technical, and it traces back to last Friday.

The reversal bar and the 7368 test

Friday handed us a steep selloff, and what I care about is how the market has behaved since. We are seeing resilience. The tape keeps trying to run off those lows. This week we made a lower low than the prior week, which satisfies condition one of the reversal bar I have been tracking. Condition two is the close. To confirm the reversal, we need a close below 7368 on Friday. If we fail to do that, the signal neutralizes and what we are looking at is consolidation, not a top.

I want to be precise here because this is the whole game. A confirmed close below 7368 opens the door toward the 7000 level, and I will get more specific as the confirmations come in. I am not going to front-run the signal, because the close is the close and we do not have it yet. But if it comes, a move to roughly 7100 would represent about a six percent decline off the highs. As I said last week, I think a five to seven percent pullback is easily in range, and nothing this week has changed that. A pullback of that size is not a crash. It is the kind of correction a healthy market takes on its way higher, and I want readers to hold both of those ideas at once: the downside line is real, and the downside it points to is ordinary.

That keeps the market nervous and choppy, and we are not getting any calming stimulus out of the Middle East to offset it. Crude is starting to hint at more weakness, a retest of the ninety dollar level, possibly a drift back into the eighty-five to ninety-five zone, and that energy picture feeds straight into the inflation and rate conversation that has the tape on edge. Lower crude is friendly for the inflation prints down the road, but in the moment, a market watching oil slide tends to read it as a growth worry rather than an inflation relief, and that nervousness is part of what keeps us pinned in the range.

But here is the other side, and it is gaining ground by the day. The window to confirm that outside reversal is closing fast. If we can get back above the 7480 to 7520 level, confirmation becomes very difficult, the probabilities drop hard, and the path of least resistance points to us continuing to track above the ten week moving average. That is not a small distinction. A market holding above its ten week line is a market in an uptrend, full stop, and the bears do not get to keep calling for a top while price sits above it. In plain terms, the bears need a Friday close under 7368 to make their case. The bulls need a push back above 7480. Between those two lines the market is locked in a range, and the range itself is the honest read until one of those levels breaks. I am not going to pretend to know which way it resolves before the tape tells me.

The bigger picture has not changed

None of this alters my longer-term view. As I laid out in my last long-term forecast and in my article on the S&P reaching 10,000, I believe we have a long way to go before we see any substantial top. The breadth of the AI ecosystem is broadening beyond tech, which is healthy, and while I do expect the AI names to decelerate at some stage, I think they generally stay in a high level consolidation rather than breaking down hard. I do not see the catalyst for a major decline there right now. Looking further out, I expect productivity to start climbing as we move into the fall, and I am still targeting four to six percent expansion at some stage. That is the backdrop against which I read this week’s chop. A nervous range inside a larger uptrend is not the same thing as a top, no matter how loud the IPO rhetoric gets.

So I am holding my discipline. I respect the 7368 test because the reversal bar earned that respect, and I will not pretend it does not exist. But I am not going to let a crowded narrative talk me out of a structure that is still intact. Watch the close on Friday. Watch 7480 on the upside. The market will tell us which story it wants, and until it does, the range is the truth.

Economic Calendar — Week Ahead

Week of June 08 - 12

Jun 09

06:00 ET: NFIB Small Business Optimism

For: May | Trading Impact: Low | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: 95.9

08:30 ET: Trade Balance

For: Apr | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: -$58.0B | KR Forecast Cons: -$55.5B | Prior: -$60.3B

10:00 ET: Existing Home Sales

For: May | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 0.3% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.6% | Prior: 0.2%

10:00 ET: Wholesale Inventories

For: Apr | Trading Impact: Low | KR Forecast: 0.4% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.5% | Prior: 1.3%

Jun 10

07:00 ET: MBA Mortgage Applications Index

For: 06/06 | Trading Impact: Low | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: -2.3%

08:30 ET: CPI

For: May | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 0.6% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.5% | Prior: 0.6%

08:30 ET: Core CPI

For: May | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 0.4% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.3% | Prior: 0.4%

10:30 ET: EIA Crude Oil Inventories

For: 06/06 | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: -7.97M

14:00 ET: Treasury Budget

For: May | Trading Impact: Low | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: $215.0B

Jun 11

08:30 ET: PPI

For: May | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 0.8% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.7% | Prior: 1.4%

08:30 ET: Core PPI

For: May | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 0.5% | KR Forecast Cons: 0.4% | Prior: 1.0%

08:30 ET: Initial Claims

For: 06/06 | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 220K | KR Forecast Cons: 222K | Prior: 215K

08:30 ET: Continuing Claims

For: 05/30 | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: 1786K

10:30 ET: EIA Natural Gas Inventories

For: 06/06 | Trading Impact: Low | KR Forecast: NA | KR Forecast Cons: NA | Prior: +95 bcf

Jun 12

10:00 ET: Univ. of Michigan Consumer Sentiment - Prelim

For: Jun | Trading Impact: High | KR Forecast: 45.5 | KR Forecast Cons: 46.2 | Prior: 44.8

AdviZe.io

AdviZe.io - Stop Guessing. Trade with Clarity.

WaveTech Database

The WaveTech Database opens the week tilted constructive at the sector level and far more mixed underneath. Sectors read 66.67 percent long, eight of twelve carrying positions, which sits well above the 42 percent dividing line and keeps the top tier in sustainable upside territory. Drop a level and the picture cools. Groups read 51.96 percent long, just over the midline, and symbols read 49.26 percent long, a hair under it. That stair-step down from sectors to groups to symbols is the read to hold onto. The broad institutional posture is still tilted toward sustainability, but participation thins as you move from the macro tier into the individual names, and that thinning is the database’s way of saying conviction is concentrated at the top rather than broadly shared.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of The Kendall Report.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Robert Kendall · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture